One shouldn't disagree with Coover's concluding remarks regarding
the final say on the status of words in digital writing.
Text
at the outset of this new millennium remains our traditional
source of content, of meaning.
One shouldn't disagree if one understands that text in the twenty first century means
words and the other elements which construct hypermedia: sound, image, and whatever may follow
in the not too distant future. To think otherwise would be to isolate
ourselves from the technology around us and its influence on expression.
Overall, the mistake may not be in mourning the passing of the
"Golden Age" of text based
hypertext, but to think of Golden Ages in general. The nostalgia the Web
supports is not that of Golden Ages or precious pasts; it is a nostalgia
of popular culture, of iconicity, of entertainment as discourse. It is a
place where we are always in the past. When we realize this, we no longer
have to worry over how new developments in electronic writing threaten old
norms. Instead, we can reevaluate old norms within
the framework of new technology. We can begin to think of how to write nostalgically from
a different angle, one of juxtaposition, one outside referentiality, one
which is neither the end nor the beginning of anything, but rather is just
writing as we know it.