From this point of view, "totality" does not mean the hopeless task of a quantitative summation. It means
rather consistency of mode of response in reference to the plurality of events which occur. Consistency
does not mean literal identity; for since the same thing does not happen twice, an exact repetition of a
reaction involves some maladjustment. Totality means continuity -- the carrying on of a former habit of
action with the readaptation necessary to keep it alive and growing. Instead of signifying a ready-made
complete scheme of action, it means keeping the balance in a multitude of diverse actions, so that each
borrows and gives significance to every other. Any person who is open-minded and sensitive to new
perceptions, and who has concentration and responsibility in connecting them has, in so far, a philosophic
disposition. One of the popular senses of philosophy is calm and endurance in the face of difficulty and
loss; it is even supposed to be a power to bear pain without complaint. This meaning is a tribute to the
influence of the Stoic philosophy rather than an attribute of philosophy in general. But in so far as it
suggests that the wholeness characteristic of philosophy is a power to learn, or to extract meaning, from
even the unpleasant vicissitudes of experience and to embody what is learned in an ability to go on
learning, it is justified in any scheme. An analogous interpretation applies to the generality and
ultimateness of philosophy. Taken literally, they are absurd pretensions; they indicate insanity. Finality
does not mean, however, that experience is ended and exhausted, but means the disposition to penetrate
to deeper levels of meaning -- to go below the surface and find out the connections of any event or
object, and to keep at it. In like manner the philosophic attitude is general in the sense that it is averse to
taking anything as isolated; it tries to place an act in its context -- which constitutes its significance.
- (Dewey)
|